Molecular Oncology
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 42-54, June 2007

Cancer therapeutic antibodies come of age: Targeting minimal residual disease

  • Tsipi Ben-Kasus

      Affiliations

    • Department of Immunology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
  • ,
  • Bilha Schechter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Immunology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
  • ,
  • Michael Sela

      Affiliations

    • Department of Immunology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
  • ,
  • Yosef Yarden

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biological Regulation, The Feinberg Graduate School, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Room 302, Rehovot 76100, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +972 8 9343974; Fax: +972 8 9342488.

Received 18 January 2007; accepted 24 January 2007. published online 02 April 2007.

Article Outline

Abstract 

Ten years after the first clinical application of Rituximab, an anti-CD20 recombinant monoclonal antibody, immunotherapy has become common practice in oncology wards. Thanks to the great diversity of the immune system and the powerful methodology of genetic engineering, the pharmacologic potential of antibody-based therapy is far from exhaustion. The recent application of Trastuzumab, an antibody to a receptor tyrosine kinase, in adjuvant breast cancer therapy marks the beginning of a new phase in cancer treatment. Here we discuss molecular mechanisms of antibody-based therapy, the emerging ability to target minimal disease and the therapeutic potential of combining antibodies with other modalities.

Keywords: Antibody, Cancer, CD20, Cytotoxicity, Hybridoma, Therapy

 

Back to Article Outline

1. Introduction 

The vision of antibody-based therapies tracks back to the “magic bullet” concept proposed by the German chemist Paul Ehrlich, exactly 100 years ago. Accordingly, selective targeting of a toxin to a disease-causing agent will enable eradication of the disease. This vision materialized with the generation of the first monoclonal antibodies by Georges Köhler and César Milstein in 1975 (Kohler and Milstein, 1975) (see Timeline). By selecting a clone of lymphocytes that permanently secrete antibodies specific to a single determinant on an antigen of choice, mAbs provide the ultimate selective vector Paul Ehrlich had envisioned. Surprisingly, and in contrast to the original theory, in many cases a toxic payload need not arm mAbs in order to kill pathogenic targets. For example, the laboratory of Robert A. Weinberg identified in the early 1980s a cell surface glycoprotein, p185-Neu/HER2, which undergoes mutagenesis when animals are exposed to a chemical carcinogen (Bargmann et al., 1986). The mutant protein, which turned out to be a receptor tyrosine kinase, potently transforms naïve cells to become tumorigenic, but murine mAbs specific to p185-Neu/HER2 retarded tumorigenic cell growth in animals (Drebin et al., 1986).

The murine origin of mAbs to p185-Neu/HER2 and other antigens limits their clinical application in several respects: such immunoglobulin molecules are immunogenic when injected into humans, which shortens their half-lives in the circulation. In addition, due to their rodent constant regions, the ability of murine mAbs to recruit effector functions of the human immune system is inefficient. The first strategy that partly overcomes these limitations was introduced in 1984 (Boulianne et al., 1984, Morrison et al., 1984): the antigen-binding variable domains of the heavy and light chains of a parental murine antibody were, respectively, joined to human constant domains, corresponding to the heavy and light chains of immunoglobulins (see Box 1). An alternative to the generation of such mouse–human chimeric antibodies was put forward in 1988 by Greg Winter and colleagues (Riechmann et al., 1988), who humanized antibodies by grafting the murine antigen-binding loops (complementary-determining regions; CDRs) into a human immunoglobulin molecule. Phage display technologies (Marks et al., 1991, Griffiths et al., 1993) offer yet another alternative, whereby the antibody repertoire of human B cells is represented by very large gene libraries. Once selected, the affinity of the human antibody may be enhanced for clinical applications by using mutagenesis. Last, transgenic mice whose immunoglobulin loci have been genetically inactivated, and which instead carry many, or all, human immunoglobulin genes, may be used for immunization and standard hybridoma technology (Fishwild et al., 1996, Mendez et al., 1997). The first fully human antibody derived from transgenic mice, Panitumumab, an antibody to a sibling of p185-Neu-HER2, namely the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (Yang et al., 1999) has recently been approved for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Although cancer therapeutic antibodies have yet to achieve the ultimate goal of curing cancer, the number of antibodies approved for cancer therapy is steadily increasing (see Table 1), along with the mushrooming of antibodies currently tested in clinical trials (Table 2).

  • View full-size image.
  • Box 1. 

    Generation of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Despite their early promise, murine antibodies (red) produced by hybridomas are largely unsuccessful as therapeutic reagents, due to both insufficient activation of human effector functions and immune reactions against proteins of rodent origin. Chimeric antibodies are generated by fusion of mouse-derived variable (V) regions to human constant (C) regions (human antibodies are shown in gray). The chimeric antibody molecule retains binding affinity for an antigen, and acquires the function of the substituted human C regions, allowing more efficient interaction with human CDC and ADCC, as well as less immunogenic reactions compared to murine C regions. Humanization of murine antibodies offers an alternative strategy. Humanized antibodies are generated by grafting the mouse complementarity-determining regions (CDRs; dark red) into the human V-framework regions and expressed with human C regions. This procedure decreases immunogenicity of the mAb. Unlike chimeric and humanized antibodies, the production of fully human antibodies does not rely on a parental murine antibody. Strategies for the production of fully human antibodies include the use of phage display antibody libraries or transgenic animals, both utilizing human V region repertories. Recombinant fragments of murine or human antibodies offer other advantages. They include a variable fragment (Fv) and single chain Fv (scFv) molecules. The small scFvs are particularly interesting for clinical application, since they are relatively small, thus have lower retention times in non-target tissues, and they better penetrate into tumors. Bivalent scFv fragments may be produced by adding a carboxyl-terminal cysteine.

Table 1. Recombinant antibodies approved for use in oncology
Antibody trade name (generic name)Antigen targetAntibody typeStrategy to enhance activity of naked antibodyTumor targetApproved in
Rituxan (Rituximab)CD20Chimeric IgG1Combination with chemotherapyNHL1997
Herceptin (Trastuzumab)ErbB-2Humanized IgG1Combination with chemotherapyMetastatic breast cancer1998
Mylotarg (Gemtuzumab ozogamicin)CD33Humanized IgG4Calicheamicin conjugateAML2000
Campath (Alemtuzumab)CD52Humanized IgG1NoneB-cell CLL2001
Zevalin (Ibritumomab tituxetan)CD20Murine IgG190YttriumNHL2001
Bexxar (131I-Tositumomab)CD20Murine IgG2131IodineNHL2001
Avastin (Bevacizumab)VEGFHumanized IgG1Combination with 5-fluorouracilCRC2004
Erbitux (Cetuximab)EGFRChimeric IgG1Combination with irinotecan (CRC) or radiotherapy (SCHN)CRC2004/2006
SCHN
ABX-EGF (Panitumumab)EGFRHuman IgG2Combination with IFLCRCFast track

AML, acute myelogenous leukemia; BC, breast cancer; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; CRC, colorectal cancer; IFL, irinotecan/leucovorin/5-flurouracil; NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; SCHN, squamous-cell of head and neck.

Table 2. Recombinant antibodies in clinical evaluation for use in oncology (see www.clinicaltrials.gov)
Antibody trade name (generic name)Antigen targetAntibody typeStrategy to enhance activity of naked antibodyTumor targetClinical trial
BEC2 (Mitumomab)Anti-idiotypic mAbs, GD3 ganglioside mimicMurine IgG2VaccineSCLCPhase III
MelanomaPhase II
CDP-791VEGFR-2/KDRHuman di-Fab Linked with PEGCombination with chemotherapyLCPhase II
CeaVacAnti-idiotypic mAbs, CEA mimicMurine IgG1Vaccine in combination with chemotherapy for CRC or TriAb for NSCLCCRCPhase III
NSCLCPhase II
DenosumabRANKLHuman IgG2NonePCPhase III
Multiple MyelomaPhase II
EMD 72000 (Matuzumab)EGFRHumanized IgG1Combination with chemotherapy for advanced LCMetastatic esophagogastric cancerPhase II
Advanced LCPhase II
HGS-ETR1 (Mapatumumab)TRAIL-1Human IgG1NoneNHLPhase II
NSCLCPhase II
HuMax-CD4 (Zanolimumab)CD4Human IgG1NoneT-LymphomaPhase III
HuMax-CD20 (Ofatumumab)CD20Human IgG1Combination with chemotherapy for FLFLPhase III
B-CLLPhase III
HuMV833VEGF-AHumanized IgG4NoneAdvanced ovarian cancer and CRCPhase I
LMB-2 (α-TAC(Fv-PE38))αCD 25Human dsFv-PE38 fusion proteinImmunotoxin in combination with peptide vaccine for skin cancerCLLPhase II
Skin cancerPhase II
MDX-010 (Ipilimumab)CTLA-4Human IgG1Combined with vaccine or chemotherapy for melanomaMelanomaPhase II/III
Pancreatic cancerPhase II
PCPhase I
LymphomaPhase I/II
MDX-210ErBb-2Murine F(ab′)2BispecificOvarian cancerPhase III
X CD64 (FcγRI)
Omnitarg (Pertuzumab)ErBb-2Humanized IgG1Combined with chemotherapy or with TrastuzumabOvarian cancerPhase II
Breast cancerPhase II
Ovarex (Oregovoma)CA 125Murine IgG1Combination with chemotherapyOvarian cancerPhase II/III
Panorex (Edrecolomab)EpCamMurine IgG2Combination with chemotherapyDukes' C CRCApproved in Germany 1995
Rencarex (WX-G250)CA-IXMN/G250Chimeric IgG190Yttrium for kidney cancerKidney cancerPhase I/II
ARCCPhase I/II
SGN 40CD40Humanized IgG1NoneCLLPhase I/II
NHLPhase I
SS1P (SS1 (dsFv)-PE38)α-mesothelinHuman dsFv-PE38 fusion proteinImmunotoxinMesothelioma, ovarian, head and neck cancerPhase II
Theragyn (Pemtumomab)PEMMurine IgG190Yttrium for OC and GCOvarian cancerPhase III
Vaccine in combination with surgery and chemotherapy for OC Phase I –as vaccine
Gastric cancerPhase II
ZamylCD33Humanized IgG1Combination with chemotherapyAMLPhase III
Zenapax (Daclizumab)CD25Humanized IgG190Yttrium for HL and NHLT cell leukemia/lymphomaPhase II
HL/NHLPhase I/II

ALL, acute lymphocytic leukemia; AML, acute myelogenous leukemia; ARCC, advanced renal cell carcinoma; BC, breast cancer; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; CRC, colorectal cancer; GC, gastric cancer; FL, follicular lymphoma; NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; LC, lung cancer; OC, ovarian cancer; PC, prostate cancer; PE38, Pseudomonas exotoxin A catalytic domain.

Back to Article Outline

2. The targets for antibody-based therapy of cancer: tumor-associated antigens 

Of all parameters needed for optimization of a therapeutic antibody, selection of the target antigen is the most critical step. Glycoproteins found on the surface of tumor cells emerge as useful targets for antibody-based therapy. Several tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) of hematopoietic cells have been targeted in animal or in clinical trials, including CD20, CD22, CD25, CD33, CD40 and CD52. Likewise, receptor tyrosine kinases residing on the surface of malignant epithelial cells (e.g., HER2/ErbB-2 and EGFR), or normal endothelial cells (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; VEGFR), prove useful as targets for therapeutic antibodies (see Table 1, Table 2). A third group of antigens, which may mount an effective therapeutic response, comprises cell adhesion molecules like mucin 1 (MUC1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA1), various integrins (e.g., αVβ3, a molecule enriched on vascular endothelial cells) and EpCAM. The latter is the target of Panorex (Edrecolomab), a murine antibody which was used in Europe for the treatment of Duke's colorectal cancer. EpCAM is an epithelial cell adhesion molecule, acting by mechanically attaching cells to the matrix or to other cells (Balzar et al., 1999).

This review will concentrate primarily on two antigens, CD20 and ErbB-2/HER2, as well as on antibodies that therapeutically target them. CD20 is a surface phosphoprotein, whose biology is poorly understood, despite the remarkable success of immunotherapy targeted at this antigen (Cragg et al., 2005). For example, no ligand of CD20 has been identified and mice defective in the corresponding genes display an apparently normal phenotype (O'Keefe et al., 1998). The 37kDa protein is expressed on 95% of cases of B cell lymphoma and leukemia, and no soluble form of the antigen has been detected, making it an attractive target for therapeutic mAbs. CD20 spans the plasma membrane four times and presents an extracellular loop of 43 residues, between the third and the fourth transmembrane domains (Polyak and Deans, 2002). It is thought that CD20 exists as a tetramer, which translocates upon antibody binding into lipid-ordered membrane domains called rafts. Following ligation of B-cell antigen receptors, raft-localized CD20 may act as a store-operated calcium channel (Polyak et al., 1998). Antibody-induced association of CD20 with lipid rafts and consequent calcium influx and caspase activation, may play essential roles in immunotherapy (Janas et al., 2005), as will be discussed below.

Unlike CD20, ErbB-2/HER2 is a large (1234 residues, 185kDa) glycoprotein that spans the plasma membrane only once. The extracellular portion of human ErbB-2 (residues 1–632), like the EGFR, consists of four sub-domains, which present multiple antigenic determinants, including the juxtamembrane Trastuzumab's epitope (Cho et al., 2003). Unlike EGFR and other ErbB family members, no known growth factor binds with the extracellular domain of ErbB-2. Instead, this receptor tyrosine kinase acts as a shared signaling subunit that heterodimerizes with ligand-activated ErbB-1/EGFR, ErbB-3 and ErbB-4 (Klapper et al., 1999). Consistent with this notion, the three-dimensional structure of ErbB-2's ectodomain revealed an active conformation similar to that of ligand-activated EGFR (Garrett et al., 2003). In addition, ErbB-2null mice display phenotypes shared with both ErbB-3null (Erickson et al., 1997, Riethmacher et al., 1997) and ErbB-4null animals (Gassmann et al., 1995). Notably, ErbB-4null mice and ErbB-2null animals share a defect in cardiac muscle differentiation previously observed in animals lacking expression of a ligand for ErbB-4, neuregulin-1, an observation related to the major adverse clinical effect of Trastuzumab (see below).

A unique landmark of ErbB-2 is frequent overexpression in a variety of human adenocarcinomas (Slamon et al., 1989), primarily due to amplification of the corresponding portion of chromosome 17. A recent large compilation of studies confirmed the initial observation made by Dennis Slamon (Slamon et al., 1989), namely that ErbB-2 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer patients (Ross et al., 2003). Moreover, ErbB-2 expression is inversely correlated with steroid hormone receptors (Konecny et al., 2003). Breast cancer tumors that overexpress ErbB-2 are more likely to be of ductal rather than lobular origin, with higher grade, DNA aneuploidy, p53 mutations, and topoisomerase II amplification. In transgenic models, genomic amplification of ErbB-2 associates with tumor progression (Andrechek and Muller, 2000), and multiple lines of in vitro evidence implicate overexpression with enhanced signaling due to retardation of growth factor dissociation, altered receptor trafficking and recruitment of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, as well as the Akt/protein kinase B pathway (reviewed in Citri and Yarden (2006)). In summary, an overexpressed human ErbB-2, similar to a rodent mutant (Bargmann et al., 1986), harbors potent oncogenic activities. Since high density of ErbB-2 molecules at the cell surface predicts response to immunotherapy (Mass, 2000), the mechanism of antibody action may entail inhibition of one or several oncogenic features of ErbB-2.

Back to Article Outline

3. Clinical development of therapeutic antibodies 

Rituximab (Rituxan, IDEC Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA, and Genentech Inc., San Francisco, CA) was originally approved for use against indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), but its use has expanded to other CD20-positive NHL, as well as to non-cancer disorders, such as autoimmune disorders. B-cell NHL corresponds to specific stages of normal B-cell development (Harris et al., 1994). Currently, NHL is one of the six most common malignancies in western societies and its current incidence not only increases with age, but also within any given age group. Rituximab has been approved based on a pivotal clinical trial demonstrating response rate of 48% in 166 indolent NHL patients (McLaughlin et al., 1998). The median duration of response was 11.6 months. Participants received an outpatient intravenous treatment course of the chimeric antibody (375mg/m2) weekly for four weeks. Interestingly, in phase I trials, no maximum tolerated dose was achieved, due to lack of toxicity. Despite high efficacy and expression of CD20 in all patients treated with Rituximab, the antibody is active in only 50–60% of follicular lymphoma and 10–15% of small lymphocytic lymphoma (McLaughlin et al., 1998). Thus, similar to other antibody-treated diseases, there must exist mechanisms of antigen-independent resistance to therapy.

Trastuzumab (Herceptin, Genentech Inc., San Francisco, CA) is used at present as a single agent for patients with ErbB-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer, who received at least one regimen of chemotherapy. In addition, breast cancer patients whose tumors overexpress ErbB-2, and who have not received chemotherapy for their metastatic disease may be treated with a combination of chemotherapy (e.g., taxol) and Trastuzumab. Clinical testing of Trastuzumab followed observations of the antibody's ability to inhibit proliferation of both cultured breast cancer cell lines, as well as tumorigenic growth of tumor xenografts (Hudziak et al., 1989, McKenzie et al., 1989). Early clinical trials demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of breast cancer patients whose ErbB-2-positive lesions relapsed following conventional treatment (Baselga et al., 1996, Pegram et al., 1998). A pivotal single arm phase II trial recruited patients who had progressive disease after one or two cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease (Cobleigh et al., 1999). Patients (n=220) received a loading dose of Trastuzumab (4mg/kg) followed by weekly doses (2mg/kg). Other than infusion-related symptoms, all other adverse effects were minor, with the exception of cardiac dysfunction in 10 patients. The overall response to Trastuzumab was 15% (Review Evaluation Committee) and 22% (investigator-assessed response). The median response duration and survival were 9.1 and 13 months, respectively.

A subsequent pivotal phase III combination trial tested safety and efficacy of a combination of Trastuzumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (Slamon et al., 2001). Only ErbB-2-positive patients (n=469), who had received no prior therapy for metastatic disease, were eligible for entry into the trial. Two chemotherapy regimens were used: anthracyclin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) or paclitaxel. The addition of Trastuzumab to AC increased the average time to progression (TTP) from 6.1 to 7.8 months, and the combination with paclitaxel was even more effective. Likewise, Trastuzumab combination therapy significantly improved other parameters, including median survival (25 months, compared with 20 months following chemotherapy alone). The most serious adverse event of Trastuzumab was an increased risk for cardiac dysfunction in patients receiving concomitant AC. Of particular interest is the fact that combination therapy was especially effective in the group of patients whose ErbB-2 expression was very high (3+ subset).

Antibody combination with chemotherapy is a shared feature of several therapeutic antibodies. This has been instigated with the observation that an antibody to EGFR can sensitize cancer cells to the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin (Aboud-Pirak et al., 1988), an observation later extended to other chemotherapeutic agents and irradiation, as well as to other antibodies, such as Trastuzumab. As a result, both clinically approved antibodies to EGFR, Cetuximab and Panitumumab (Vecitibix), are used in combination with chemotherapy to treat colorectal cancer. Further, the recently approved combination of Cetuximab and radiotherapy improves locoregional control and reduces mortality of patients with head and neck cancer (Bonner et al., 2006). A phase II study of Rituximab in combination with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, aggressive NHL and a median follow-up of 63 months, reported an overall response (OR) rate of 94% and complete response (CR) rate of 61% at the end of therapy (Vose et al., 2005). This durable effect of combination therapy on overall survival, and the absence of long-term adverse events, will be tested in ongoing randomized phase III trials. In vitro studies confirm the ability of Rituximab to chemosensitize several NHL B-cell lines (Bonavida and Vega, 2005). Similarly, various Trastuzumab combinations with chemotherapeutic agents revealed either synergistic interactions at clinically relevant drug concentrations, additive cytotoxic effects, or, rarely, antagonistic interactions (Pegram et al., 1999). As will be discussed below, the mechanism underlying the clinical benefit of combination therapy may not involve immune effector functions, but rather an intrinsic ability of several therapeutic antibodies to block survival pathways.

Back to Article Outline

4. Mechanisms of action of therapeutic antibodies 

Two major modes of action enable monoclonal antibodies to inhibit cancer cell growth: immune mechanisms and mechanisms that intercept pathways of tumorigenesis (see Figure 1). The immune mechanisms include antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), whereas mechanisms that intercept pathways of tumorigenesis include a large variety of machineries, such as triggering of apoptosis, blocking angiogenesis, inhibiting tumor cell proliferation, interfering with signaling cascades and accelerating receptor internalization.

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 1 

    Mechanisms of action of therapeutic antibodies. Binding of mAbs (orange) to antigens (green) on target cells can induce complement binding (via the C1 component) and activate ADCC, which requires interaction between the Fc portion of the antibody and FcγR molecules on effector cells, such as natural killer (NK) lymphocytes. Angiogenesis and cell growth are inhibited through downregulation of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and mAbs interfering with growth factor (GF) binding, respectively. Intracellular degradation of surface antigens is preceded by endocytosis (internalization) of antigen-bound mAbs (e.g., Trastuzumab). In the case of Rituximab, apoptosis occurs upon tyrosine kinase signaling and mobilization of intracellular calcium.

Back to Article Outline

5. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity 

ADCC is a well-recognized immune effector mechanism, in which antigen-specific antibodies direct immune effector cells (NK cells, monocyte-macrophages and leukocytes, especially neutrophils) to the killing of antigen-expressing cancer cells (Iannello and Ahmad, 2005). ADCC is a tripartite process involving three components: (i) the expression of the target antigen on cancer cells, (ii) the presence of the antigen-specific antibodies of the appropriate isotype, and (iii) Fc receptor-bearing effector cells. ADCC is associated with the anti-tumor cell effects induced by Rituximab, Trastuzumab, Daclizumab (anti-IL-2 receptor; CD25) and other antibodies (Clynes et al., 2000, Ravetch and Lanier, 2000). Murine xenogenic models of human tumors were shown to involve the association of the antibody with Fc receptors (FcRs) type I, III or IV (Nimmerjahn et al., 2005). Significant diminished efficacy of antibodies directed toward malignant cells was demonstrated using FcRγ−/− deficient mice that do not express FcγRIII, the stimulatory Fc receptor. In contrast, mice deficient in the ADCC inhibitory FcγRIIb are hypersensitive to antibody-mediated tumor suppression. Clinical trials correlating the response of NHL patients to Rituximab with polymorphisms of Fc receptors support a role for ADCC in immunotherapy (Cartron et al., 2002, Weng and Levy, 2003). Studies involving FcγR-deficient mice (Clynes et al., 2000), as well as bivalent fragments of anti-ErbB-2 mAbs lacking the Fc portion (Spiridon et al., 2004), have shown that ADCC is a predominant mechanism of action of anti-ErbB-2 antibodies.

Some observations suggest that the outcome of patients who receive Rituximab can be improved if the amount and function of their immune effector cell population (in particular, NK cells) are preserved or enhanced. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a cytokine that strongly increases the number and activity of polymorphonuclears and macrophages against opsonized targets (Bober et al., 1995). Therefore, attempts to improve Rituximab efficacy are directed toward combined treatments with GM-CSF, based upon the evidence that this cytokine can up-regulate CD20 expression on lymphoid B cells and enhance ADCC (Olivieri et al., 2005). Similarly, it has been suggested that IL-2 can promote NK cell development and enhance Rituximab activity (Olivieri et al., 2005). Alternative approaches such as enhanced effector cell activity induced by CpG oligonucleotides are also under investigation (Lopes de Menezes et al., 2007).

Back to Article Outline

6. Complement-dependent cytotoxicity 

Complement lysis is controlled both by a series of zymogen activators (C1−C9) and by a series of inhibitory proteins (e.g., CD35, CD46, CD55 and CD59). Direct evidence for the role of CDC is reflected by the reduced efficacy of Rituximab in animals lacking C1q, the first component of the classical complement pathway (Di Gaetano et al., 2003). Likewise, complement inhibitory proteins have been shown to inhibit Rituximab-mediated cell killing, and blocking the inhibitors enhanced Rituximab-mediated CDC (Golay et al., 2001). Similarly, Trastuzumab was shown to mediate CDC in vitro when human immune effector cells and serum were used, but it was ineffective when the immune effector cells and sera were of mouse origin (Spiridon et al., 2002). Another line of evidence supporting CDC involvement is reflected by the ability of β-glucan to enhance the effects of Rituximab in animals (Modak et al., 2005). The enhancement effect is mediated by the CR3 receptor molecule of granulocytes, which recognizes tumor cells coated with the inhibitory iC3b component of the complement (Hong et al., 2004). Taken together, CDC and ADCC are thought to be important effector mechanisms of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Moreover, it was suggested that CDC induced by Rituximab depends on CD20 density, and that CDC and ADCC act complementarily (van Meerten et al., 2006).

Back to Article Outline

7. Interception of oncogenic pathways 

7.1. Enhancing cancer cell apoptosis 

Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, occurs through two main pathways: the extrinsic pathway can be triggered by cytokines (e.g., TNF and TRAIL) and the intrinsic (or mitochondrial) pathway, leading to cytochrome release from mitochondria and downregulation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins. Both pathways converge to activate a cascade of proteases, caspases, which cleave regulatory and structural molecules. Several therapeutic antibodies have been implicated in the induction of apoptosis via the intrinsic pathway. In the case of Rituximab, apoptosis is induced by two main alleys: either via accelerating calcium flux, or by direct induction of the intrinsic pathway. CD20 can act as a calcium channel modulator (Bubien et al., 1993). In addition, crosslinking of CD20 molecules stimulates certain Src-family protein tyrosine kinases, which activate a phospholipase, mobilize calcium ions and activate caspase-3 (Hofmeister et al., 2000). Similar to Rituximab, Trastuzumab induces apoptotic pathways within ErbB-2-expressing mammary tumors (Mohsin et al., 2005). The pro-apoptotic activity of Trastuzumab has been attributed to inhibition of constitutively activated MAP-kinase and Akt pathways downstream to ErbB-2, and to TRAIL-induced apoptosis (Cuello et al., 2001). In the case of EGFR, it has been reported that treatment with Cetuximab or with similar anti-EGFR antibodies elevated expression of Bax (pro-apoptosis) and decreased Bcl-2 (anti-apoptosis) (Huang et al., 1999).

7.2. Inhibiting tumor cell proliferation 

Cell cycle progression is controlled by a series of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), their activators (Cyclins), or inhibitors. For example, elevated expression of p27Kip, a key regulator of the G1/S transition, arrests cells at the G1/S phase. Rituximab in combination with irradiation up-regulates expression of p27Kip and inhibits cell growth (Skvortsova et al., 2006). It was proposed that Rituximab-induced growth inhibition is mediated through a ceramide-triggered signaling pathway, leading to the induction of p27Kip through a MAP-kinase-dependent mechanism (Bezombes et al., 2004). As in the case of Rituximab, cells treated with Trastuzumab undergo arrest during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, accompanied by reduced expression of proteins involved in sequestration of p27Kip, including Cyclin D1. This results in the release of p27Kip, allowing it to bind and inhibit Cyclin E/CDK2 complexes (Lane et al., 2001). Trastuzumab treatment also results in an accumulation of p27Kip, although this seems to occur secondary to the formation of p27Kip–CDK2 complexes, perhaps as a result of decreased targeting of p27Kip to the ubiquitin-proteasome. Other antibodies, such as Cetuximab and M225 (its murine progenitor), also interfere with cell cycle progression through the involvement of p27Kip in G1 arrest (Peng et al., 1996).

7.3. Curtailing angiogenesis 

Tumor cells must use the process of vascularization, or angiogenesis, for productive growth and metastasis (Saaristo et al., 2000). The formation of a vascular network in tumors involves several angiogenic factors, including the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A), which promotes endothelial cell survival and proliferation. Transcription of VEGF mRNA is induced by low oxygen conditions (hypoxia), as well as by different growth factors and cytokines, including EGF family members. Attempts aimed at blocking angiogenesis by targeting either VEGFs or their major receptor, VEGFR-2, yielded a murine antibody, which targets all isoforms of VEGF-A. The humanized antibody not only inhibited growth of endothelial cells, but also retarded tumor growth in animals (Presta et al., 1997). Moreover, when combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, the humanized antibody, Bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech/Roche), enhanced tumor suppression in animals (reviewed in Ferrara (2005)). These preclinical results, along with mild and reversible adverse effects observed in monkeys, formed the foundation for an extensive program of clinical trials, which led to the approval of Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, and many ongoing tests in other malignancies. An alternative strategy targets the receptor for VEGF, VEGFR-2 (Lu et al., 2003). The high-affinity antibody prevents the binding of VEGF, and prolongs survival of animals grafted with human leukemic cells. Interestingly, when tested in mice Trastuzumab induced normalization and regression of the vasculature in an experimental human breast tumor (Izumi et al., 2002). The mechanism may involve downregulation of VEGF production by tumor cells (Petit et al., 1997). Furthermore, according to in vitro lines of evidence, Trastuzumab better inhibits angiogenesis when combined with chemotherapy (e.g., paclitaxel).

7.4. Interfering with signaling cascades 

Therapeutic antibodies may activate cellular signaling pathways culminating in retardation of malignancy. Binding of CD20 by Rituximab, especially if cross-linked, activates a phosphatidylinositol- (PI-) specific phospholipase (PLC-γ) leading to p38-MAP-kinase activation, and apoptosis which can be inhibited by a p38-specific inhibitor (Pedersen et al., 2002). PLC-γ generates a second messenger (IP3) which leads to calcium flux-mediated apoptosis (Hofmeister et al., 2000). CD20 density and clustering by Rituximab determine the extent of response, in part because ligated molecules rapidly redistribute into lipid rafts (Deans et al., 2002). Interestingly, anti-EGFR and anti-ErbB-2 mAbs often induce tyrosine phosphorylation by dimerizing the respective receptor (Yarden, 1990), but only rarely do they enhance cell growth (Stancovski et al., 1991). According to one explanation, antibodies may stimulate inhibitory pathways, such as the PTEN phosphatase. PTEN (MMAC1/TEP) dephosphorylates position D3 of membrane phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate (PI(3,4,5)P3), thereby dissociating AKT from the cell membrane and negatively regulating the enzyme (Sulis and Parsons, 2003). PTEN expression is reduced following activation of cells with ErbB ligands (Nicholson et al., 2003), but Trastuzumab treatment rapidly increases membrane localization and phosphatase activity, by reducing PTEN tyrosine phosphorylation via Src inhibition (Nagata et al., 2004). Moreover, a decrease in PTEN expression confers resistance to Trastuzumab. Another potential mechanism of Trastuzumab action relates to a slow extracellular proteolytic cleavage of ErbB-2, yielding a p110-ErbB-2 (extracellular) and a p95-ErbB-2 (cytoplasmic domain), which appears to be a constitutively active kinase (Christianson et al., 1998). Because Trastuzumab inhibits ErbB-2 cleavage by surface metalloproteinases (Molina et al., 2001), diminished production of the active p95 fragment may underlie the inhibitory effect of the therapeutic antibody.

7.5. Accelerating receptor internalization 

Ligand-induced ubiquitinylation and internalization of EGFR and other receptor tyrosine kinases are considered a major cellular desensitization processes (Marmor and Yarden, 2004). In this vein, preventing membrane localization of ErbB-2 abolishes its transforming potential (Flanagan and Leder, 1988, Beerli et al., 1994). Unlike growth factors, antibodies to EGFR and ErbB-2 induce relatively slow internalization, but both routings converge at a pre-lysosomal compartment (Maier et al., 1991). According to an alternative model, the relatively slow antibody-induced degradation of ErbB-2 is due to dynamic recycling of Trastuzumab-receptor complexes (Austin et al., 2004). Whether or not antibody-induced internalization and degradation of oncogenic receptors contribute to the therapeutic potential of anti-ErbB proteins remains an open issue. Analysis of two internalizing monovalent single chain antibody fragments, which exerted no sustained growth inhibitory effects, implied that antibody-induced internalization of ErbB-2 may not play a role in growth arrest (Neve et al., 2001). On the other hand, comparison of tumor-inhibitory anti-ErbB-2 antibodies and a tumor-stimulatory antibody revealed that the former, unlike the latter, accelerated degradation of both ErbB-2 and the antibody (Hurwitz et al., 1995). Moreover, combining two antibodies that bind to distinct determinants of either EGFR or ErbB-2 significantly accelerated receptor degradation (Friedman et al., 2005), as well as enhanced ADCC and tumor inhibition (Spiridon et al., 2002). Likewise, continuous exposure of cells to Trastuzumab results in downregulation of the cell surface ErbB-2, a concurrent increase in the level of p27Kip1 and arrest of cell cycle progression (Marches and Uhr, 2004). Furthermore, according to a recent study, resistance to Trastuzumab may be attributed to autocrine secretion of EGFR ligands, which inhibit antibody-induced endocytosis of ErbB-2 (Valabrega et al., 2005). Unlike receptor tyrosine kinases, internalization may not contribute to the therapeutic potential of Rituximab. CD20 is considered an ineffectively internalizing antigen, although it follows the canonical clathrin-mediated pathway (Pulczynski et al., 1994), and reaches the recycling endosomal compartment (Pulczynski et al., 1994). Nevertheless, the ability of antibody-crosslinked CD20 to deliver cytotoxic drugs to cancer cells greatly enhances the effects of Rituximab, especially when the drug is designed to be released in lysosomes (Dijoseph et al., 2006).

7.6. Antagonizing ligand binding to tumor cells 

Binding of EGF and other growth factors instigates a plethora of signaling events culminating in cell proliferation or migration. Both Cetuximab and Panitumumab block ligand binding to EGFR, and consequently, inhibit receptor autophosphorylation (Gill et al., 1984, Yang et al., 1999). Nevertheless, experiments performed in animals indicate that the anti-tumor effects of antibodies to EGFR are independent of the ability to antagonize ligand binding (Mendelsohn and Baselga, 2000). Like EGFR, CD22, an adhesion receptor for sialic acid-bearing ligands, interacts with a number of kinases and phosphatases that bind the cytoplasmic domain through phosphorylated tyrosine residues. A ligand-blocking anti-human CD22 antibody exhibits increased cytotoxic effects on human CD22+ tumor cells, compared with non-blocking mAbs (Tuscano et al., 2003). Nevertheless, Pratuzumab, a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody, currently in clinical trials for treatment of NHL (Carnahan et al., 2007), binds to a region outside of the two amino-terminal ligand-binding domains of CD22 (Stein et al., 1993).

8. At last, adjuvant antibodies are entering clinical application 

Isolated tumor cells in the bone marrow or in other tissues, often remote from the primary lesion, may be regarded as the precursors of potentially fatal distant metastases. For example, approximately one third of node-negative breast cancer patients develop local or distant metastases, despite undetectable tumor spread at diagnosis (Bonner et al., 2006). The ability of therapeutic antibodies, such as Trastuzumab and Cetuximab, to detect antigen-overexpressing tumor cells independent of cell cluster's size, makes them suitable for micrometastases targeting. In addition, because clinical management of micrometastases requires long-term treatment, the relatively mild adverse effects of most therapeutic monoclonal antibodies make them ideal for adjuvant therapy. In line with this rationale, evidence from cross-trial analysis suggests that the clinical benefits of Trastuzumab are greater if the antibody is administered earlier in the course of the disease (Bell, 2002). Motivated by these considerations, an urgent clinical need, and the ability of Trastuzumab to extend survival of HER2-postive metastatic breast cancer patients, several large multicenter trials, including in between them more than 13,000 patients, were designed to test Trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy after surgical treatment of primary breast cancer (Baselga et al., 2006).

Notwithstanding differences in patient populations, sequencing of treatments and chemotherapy regimens, and despite the relatively short (1–2.5 years) follow-up time, adjuvant therapy with Trastuzumab has consistently shown a significant reduction in the risk of early relapse. The reported magnitudes of reduction and the overall consistency of results are considered remarkable, and Trastuzumab is rapidly becoming the standard care after surgery for high-risk, ErbB-2-positive cancer. Since the clinical lessons learned in the adjuvant Trastuzumab trials are relevant to future development of therapeutic antibodies targeted at other antigens, we concisely review below the critical efficacy and safety data. Two North American randomized trials (NASBP B31 and Intergroup N9831) tested the standard chemotherapy regimen of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC), followed by paclitaxel and 1 year with or without concurrent Trastuzumab (Romond et al., 2005). It is notable that no standard regimen for the treatment of women with node-positive breast cancer has been adopted in Europe or elsewhere, outside the United States. The HERA international trial (non-US) recruited 5090 patients who have completed at least four cycles of adjuvant therapy, and then treated (or untreated) with Trastuzumab for 1 or 2 years (Piccart-Gebhart et al., 2005). The fourth large international trial (BCIRG006), a three-arm study, treated with docetaxel plus carboplatin and Trastuzumab, or with AC followed by docetaxel, in comparison with AC followed by docetaxel and Trastuzumab (Slamon et al., 2005). A relatively small Finnish study randomized 232 patients into two arms of treatment: docetaxel or vinorelbine followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, which were combined with Trastuzumab in one arm of the study (Joensuu et al., 2006).

Taken together, the large adjuvant trials have shown that Trastuzumab reduces the 3-year risk of breast cancer recurrence by approximately 50%. For example, the combined analysis of trials NSABP B-31 and N9831 indicates that Trastuzumab significantly prolongs disease free survival time, with an absolute difference of 12% between groups at 3 years. The corresponding benefit indicated by HERA at 2-years was 8.4%. Notably, the design of HERA is unique as it includes Trastuzumab monotherapy administered sequentially (rather than concomitantly to chemotherapy), a flexible approach to previous chemotherapy (only one third of patients received previous taxanes) and recruitment of both node-positive and node-negative patients. With longer follow-up, the comparison of HERA's disease free survival curves with those of other trials will likely highlight the power of taxanes and the significance of administration schedule. Despite differences, it is remarkable that in the adjuvant setting Trastuzumab abrogated the commonly observed initial peak of recurrences occurring in the first 2–3 years. Whether or not this effect is due to antibody- or complement- mediated cytotoxicity of micrometastases remains an open question.

Although long-term treatment with Trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting emerges as an acceptable treatment from a safety perspective, there have been differences among the trials. The docetaxel–carboplatin–Trastuzumab arm of BCIRG 006 was associated with treatment-related death (0.8%), and 7% of patients of the Trastuzumab arm of HERA experienced mild or serious effects (4.7% in the control arm). The incidence of cardiac events with Trastuzumab, 0.6–3.3% higher than the respective control arm, was similar across the adjuvant trials. Nevertheless, the majority of patients who experienced treatment-related congestive heart failure improved upon treatment. Thus, adjuvant Trastuzumab is well tolerated and the risk:benefit ratio demonstrated in the clinical trials provide compelling reasons to consider adjuvant antibody treatment for women with ErbB-2-positive mammary tumors.

Back to Article Outline

9. Future directions 

The packed full pipeline of monoclonal antibodies currently undergoing oncological trials promises a steady ascending trajectory, which will likely surpass the rate witnessed in the first decade of clinical application. While it is difficult to predict the scope of future adjuvant antibody therapy, analogous to the newly approved use of Trastuzumab, it seems safe to argue that the antibody–cytotoxics therapeutic alliance is here to stay. The combination of antibodies and chemo- or radiotherapy poses a major challenge for basic researchers, since the underlying basis of cooperation remains largely unknown. The reward, however, is luring: once resolved and established at the level of predictive molecular markers, the mechanism of synergy may enable optimization of drug combination, as well as guide the selection of appropriate doses and schedules. Similarly, more efficacious cancer-inhibitory antibodies will likely follow improvements in our understanding of how certain antibodies inhibit cancer cells in vivo. Engineered immune effector functions, as well as enhanced anti-tumor intrinsic activities, will likely emerge from better mechanistic understanding. Another expected outcome is more robust and cost-effective expression systems, which will help reduce the current high costs of antibody therapy.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgements 

We thank members of our laboratory for insightful help. Our studies are supported by research grants from the National Cancer Institute, the Israel Science Foundation, the Israel Cancer Research Fund, the Prostate Cancer Foundation and the German-Israel Foundation. Y.Y. is the incumbent of the Harold and Zelda Goldenberg Professorial Chair.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Aboud-Pirak E, Hurwitz E, Pirak ME, Bellot F, Schlessinger J, Sela M. Efficacy of antibodies to epidermal growth factor receptor against KB carcinoma in vitro and in nude mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1988;80:1605–1611
  2. Andrechek ER, Muller WJ. Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer: tyrosine kinase-mediated signal transduction in transgenic mouse models of human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2000;2:211–216
  3. Austin CD, De Maziere AM, Pisacane PI, van Dijk SM, Eigenbrot C, Sliwkowski MX, et al. Endocytosis and sorting of ErbB2 and the site of action of cancer therapeutics trastuzumab and geldanamycin. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2004;15:5268–5282
  4. Balzar M, Winter MJ, de Boer CJ, Litvinov SV. The biology of the 17-1A antigen (Ep-CAM). J Mol. Med. 1999;77:699–712
  5. Bargmann CI, Hung MC, Weinberg RA. Multiple independent activations of the neu oncogene by a point mutation altering the transmembrane domain of p185. Cell. 1986;45:649–657
  6. Baselga J, et al. Phase II study of weekly intravenous recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibody in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 1996;14:737–744
  7. Baselga J, Perez EA, Pienkowski T, Bell R. Adjuvant trastuzumab: a milestone in the treatment of HER-2-positive early breast cancer. Oncologist. 2006;11(Suppl. 1):4–12
  8. Beerli RR, Wels W, Hynes NE. Intracellular expression of single chain antibodies reverts ErbB-2 transformation. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:23931–23936
  9. Bell R. What can we learn from Herceptin trials in metastatic breast cancer?. Oncology. 2002;63:39–46
  10. Bezombes C, Grazide S, Garret C, Fabre C, Quillet-Mary A, Muller S, et al. Rituximab antiproliferative effect in B-lymphoma cells is associated with acid-sphingomyelinase activation in raft microdomains. Blood. 2004;104:1166–1173
  11. Bober LA, Grace MJ, Pugliese-Sivo C, Rojas-Triana A, Waters T, Sullivan LM, et al. The effect of GM-CSF and G-CSF on human neutrophil function. Immunopharmacology. 1995;29:111–119
  12. Bonavida B, Vega MI. Rituximab-mediated chemosensitization of AIDS and non-AIDS non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Drug Resist. Updat. 2005;8:27–41
  13. Bonner JA, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;354:567–578
  14. Boulianne GL, Hozumi N, Shulman MJ. Production of functional chimaeric mouse/human antibody. Nature. 1984;312:643–646
  15. Bubien JK, Zhou LJ, Bell PD, Frizzell RA, Tedder TF. Transfection of the CD20 cell surface molecule into ectopic cell types generates a Ca2+ conductance found constitutively in B lymphocytes. J. Cell Biol. 1993;121:1121–1132
  16. Carnahan J, Stein R, Qu Z, Hess K, Cesano A, Hansen HJ, et al. Epratuzumab, a CD22-targeting recombinant humanized antibody with a different mode of action from rituximab. Mol. Immunol. 2007;44:1331–1341
  17. Cartron G, Dacheux L, Salles G, Solal-Celigny P, Bardos P, Colombat P, et al. Therapeutic activity of humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and polymorphism in IgG Fc receptor FcgammaRIIIa gene. Blood. 2002;99:754–758
  18. Cho HS, Mason K, Ramyar KX, Stanley AM, Gabelli SB, Denney DW, et al. Structure of the extracellular region of HER2 alone and in complex with the Herceptin Fab. Nature. 2003;421:756–760
  19. Christianson TA, Doherty JK, Lin YJ, Ramsey EE, Holmes R, Keenan EJ, et al. NH2-terminally truncated HER-2/neu protein: relationship with shedding of the extracellular domain and with prognostic factors in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1998;58:5123–5129
  20. Citri A, Yarden Y. EGF-ERBB signalling: towards the systems level. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006;7:505–516
  21. Clynes RA, Towers TL, Presta LG, Ravetch JV. Inhibitory Fc receptors modulate in vivo cytotoxicity against tumor targets. Nat. Med. 2000;6:443–446
  22. Cobleigh MA, et al. Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999;17:2639–2648
  23. Cragg MS, Walshe CA, Ivanov AO, Glennie MJ. The biology of CD20 and its potential as a target for mAb therapy. Curr. Dir. Autoimmun. 2005;8:140–174
  24. Cuello M, Ettenberg SA, Clark AS, Keane MM, Posner RH, Nau MM, et al. Down-regulation of the erbB-2 receptor by trastuzumab (herceptin) enhances tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-mediated apoptosis in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines that overexpress erbB-2. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4892–4900
  25. Deans JP, Li H, Polyak MJ. CD20-mediated apoptosis: signalling through lipid rafts. Immunology. 2002;107:176–182
  26. Di Gaetano N, et al. Complement activation determines the therapeutic activity of rituximab in vivo. J. Immunol. 2003;171:1581–1587
  27. Dijoseph JF, Dougher MM, Armellino DC, Kalyandrug L, Kunz A, Boghaert ER, et al. CD20-specific antibody-targeted chemotherapy of non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma using calicheamicin-conjugated rituximab. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2006;[Epub ahead of print]
  28. Drebin JA, Link VC, Weinberg RA, Greene MI. Inhibition of tumor growth by a monoclonal antibody reactive with an oncogene-encoded tumor antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1986;83:9129–9133
  29. Erickson SL, O'Shea KS, Ghaboosi N, Loverro L, Frantz G, Bauer M, et al. ErbB3 is required for normal cerebellar and cardiac development: a comparison with ErbB2-and heregulin-deficient mice. Development. 1997;124:4999–5011
  30. Ferrara N. VEGF as a therapeutic target in cancer. Oncology. 2005;69(Suppl. 3):11–16
  31. Fishwild DM, et al. High-avidity human IgG kappa monoclonal antibodies from a novel strain of minilocus transgenic mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996;14:845–851
  32. Flanagan JG, Leder P. neu proto-oncogene fused to an immunoglobulin heavy chain gene requires immunoglobulin light chain for cell surface expression and oncogenic transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1988;85:8057–8061
  33. Friedman LM, Rinon A, Schechter B, Lyass L, Lavi S, Bacus SS, et al. Synergistic down-regulation of receptor tyrosine kinases by combinations of mAbs: implications for cancer immunotherapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005;102:1915–1920
  34. Garrett TP, et al. The crystal structure of a truncated ErbB2 ectodomain reveals an active conformation, poised to interact with other ErbB receptors. Mol. Cells. 2003;11:495–505
  35. Gassmann M, Casagranda F, Orioli D, Simon H, Lai C, Klein R, et al. Aberrant neural and cardiac development in mice lacking the ErbB4 neuregulin receptor. Nature. 1995;378:390–394
  36. Gill GN, Kawamoto T, Cochet C, Le A, Sato JD, Masui H, et al. Monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies which are inhibitors of epidermal growth factor binding and antagonists of epidermal growth factor binding and antagonists of epidermal growth factor-stimulated tyrosine protein kinase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 1984;259:7755–7760
  37. Golay J, Lazzari M, Facchinetti V, Bernasconi S, Borleri G, Barbui T, et al. CD20 levels determine the in vitro susceptibility to rituximab and complement of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: further regulation by CD55 and CD59. Blood. 2001;98:3383–3389
  38. Griffiths AD, et al. Human anti-self antibodies with high specificity from phage display libraries. Embo. J. 1993;12:725–734
  39. Harris NL, et al. A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: a proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group. Blood. 1994;84:1361–1392
  40. Hofmeister JK, Cooney D, Coggeshall KM. Clustered CD20 induced apoptosis: src-family kinase, the proximal regulator of tyrosine phosphorylation, calcium influx, and caspase 3-dependent apoptosis. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2000;26:133–143
  41. Hong F, et al. Mechanism by which orally administered beta-1,3-glucans enhance the tumoricidal activity of antitumor monoclonal antibodies in murine tumor models. J. Immunol. 2004;173:797–806
  42. Huang SM, Bock JM, Harari PM. Epidermal growth factor receptor blockade with C225 modulates proliferation, apoptosis, and radiosensitivity in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer Res. 1999;59:1935–1940
  43. Hudziak RM, Lewis GD, Winget M, Fendly BM, Shepard HM, Ullrich A. p185HER2 monoclonal antibody has antiproliferative effects in vitro and sensitizes human breast tumor cells to tumor necrosis factor. Mol. Cell Biol. 1989;9:1165–1172
  44. Hurwitz E, Stancovski I, Sela M, Yarden Y. Suppression and promotion of tumor growth by monoclonal antibodies to ErbB-2 differentially correlate with cellular uptake. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995;92:3353–3357
  45. Iannello A, Ahmad A. Role of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in the efficacy of therapeutic anti-cancer monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2005;24:487–499
  46. Izumi Y, Xu L, di Tomaso E, Fukumura D, Jain RK. Tumour biology: herceptin acts as an anti-angiogenic cocktail. Nature. 2002;416:279–280
  47. Janas E, Priest R, Wilde JI, White JH, Malhotra R. Rituxan (anti-CD20 antibody)-induced translocation of CD20 into lipid rafts is crucial for calcium influx and apoptosis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2005;139:439–446
  48. Joensuu H, et al. Adjuvant docetaxel or vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab for breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;354:809–820
  49. Klapper LN, Glathe S, Vaisman N, Hynes NE, Andrews GC, Sela M, et al. The ErbB-2/HER2 oncoprotein of human carcinomas may function solely as a shared coreceptor for multiple stroma-derived growth factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999;96:4995–5000
  50. Kohler G, Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature. 1975;256:495–497
  51. Konecny G, et al. Quantitative association between HER-2/neu and steroid hormone receptors in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2003;95:142–153
  52. Lane HA, Motoyama AB, Beuvink I, Hynes NE. Modulation of p27/Cdk2 complex formation through 4D5-mediated inhibition of HER2 receptor signaling. Ann. Oncol. 2001;12:S21–S22
  53. Lopes de Menezes DE, et al. Recombinant interleukin-2 significantly augments activity of rituximab in human tumor xenograft models of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J. Immunother. 2007;30:64–74
  54. Lu D, Shen J, Vil MD, Zhang H, Jimenez X, Bohlen P, et al. Tailoring in vitro selection for a picomolar affinity human antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 for enhanced neutralizing activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:43496–43507
  55. Maier LA, Xu FJ, Hester S, Boyer CM, McKenzie S, Bruskin AM, et al. Requirements for the internalization of a murine monoclonal antibody directed against the HER-2/neu gene product c-erbB-2. Cancer Res. 1991;51:5361–5369
  56. Marches R, Uhr JW. Enhancement of the p27Kip1-mediated antiproliferative effect of trastuzumab (Herceptin) on HER2-overexpressing tumor cells. Int. J. Cancer. 2004;112:492–501
  57. Marks JD, Hoogenboom HR, Bonnert TP, McCafferty J, Griffiths AD, Winter G. By-passing immunization. Human antibodies from V-gene libraries displayed on phage. J. Mol. Biol. 1991;222:581–597
  58. Marmor MD, Yarden Y. Role of protein ubiquitylation in regulating endocytosis of receptor tyrosine kinases. Oncogene. 2004;23:2057–2070
  59. Mass R. The role of HER-2 expression in predicting response to therapy in breast cancer. Semin. Oncol. 2000;27:46–52(discussion, pp. 92–100)
  60. McKenzie SJ, Marks PJ, Lam T, Morgan J, Panicali DL, Trimpe KL, et al. Generation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for the human neu oncogene product, p185. Oncogene. 1989;4:543–548
  61. McLaughlin P, et al. Rituximab chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy for relapsed indolent lymphoma: half of patients respond to a four-dose treatment program. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998;16:2825–2833
  62. Mendelsohn J, Baselga J. The EGF receptor family as targets for cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2000;19:6550–6565
  63. Mendez MJ, et al. Functional transplant of megabase human immunoglobulin loci recapitulates human antibody response in mice. Nat. Genet. 1997;15:146–156
  64. Modak S, Koehne G, Vickers A, O'Reilly RJ, Cheung NK. Rituximab therapy of lymphoma is enhanced by orally administered (1–>3),(1–>4)-d-beta-glucan. Leuk. Res. 2005;29:679–683
  65. Mohsin SK, et al. Neoadjuvant trastuzumab induces apoptosis in primary breast cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005;23:2460–2468
  66. Molina MA, Codony-Servat J, Albanell J, Rojo F, Arribas J, Baselga J. Trastuzumab (herceptin), a humanized anti-Her2 receptor monoclonal antibody, inhibits basal and activated Her2 ectodomain cleavage in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4744–4749
  67. Morrison SL, Johnson MJ, Herzenberg LA, Oi VT. Chimeric human antibody molecules: mouse antigen-binding domains with human constant region domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1984;81:6851–6855
  68. Nagata Y, et al. PTEN activation contributes to tumor inhibition by trastuzumab, and loss of PTEN predicts trastuzumab resistance in patients. Cancer Cell. 2004;6:117–127
  69. Neve RM, Nielsen UB, Kirpotin DB, Poul MA, Marks JD, Benz CC. Biological effects of anti-ErbB2 single chain antibodies selected for internalizing function. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001;280:274–279
  70. Nicholson KM, Streuli CH, Anderson NG. Autocrine signalling through erbB receptors promotes constitutive activation of protein kinase B/Akt in breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2003;81:117–128
  71. Nimmerjahn F, Bruhns P, Horiuchi K, Ravetch JV. FcgammaRIV: a novel FcR with distinct IgG subclass specificity. Immunity. 2005;23:41–51
  72. O'Keefe TL, Williams GT, Davies SL, Neuberger MS. Mice carrying a CD20 gene disruption. Immunogenetics. 1998;48:125–132
  73. Olivieri A, et al. A new schedule of CHOP/rituximab plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor is an effective rescue for patients with aggressive lymphoma failing autologous stem cell transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11:627–636
  74. Pedersen IM, Buhl AM, Klausen P, Geisler CH, Jurlander J. The chimeric anti-CD20 antibody rituximab induces apoptosis in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells through a p38 mitogen activated protein-kinase-dependent mechanism. Blood. 2002;99:1314–1319
  75. Pegram M, et al. Inhibitory effects of combinations of HER-2/neu antibody and chemotherapeutic agents used for treatment of human breast cancers. Oncogene. 1999;18:2241–2251
  76. Pegram MD, et al. Phase II study of receptor-enhanced chemosensitivity using recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2/neu monoclonal antibody plus cisplatin in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer refractory to chemotherapy treatment. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998;16:2659–26710732–183x
  77. Peng D, Fan Z, Lu Y, DeBlasio T, Scher H, Mendelsohn J. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody 225 up-regulates p27KIP1 and induces G1 arrest in prostatic cancer cell line DU145. Cancer Res. 1996;56:3666–3669
  78. Petit AM, Rak J, Hung MC, Rockwell P, Goldstein N, Fendly B, et al. Neutralizing antibodies against epidermal growth factor and ErbB-2/neu receptor tyrosine kinases down-regulate vascular endothelial growth factor production by tumor cells in vitro and in vivo: angiogenic implications for signal transduction therapy of solid tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 1997;151:1523–1530
  79. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:1659–1672
  80. Polyak MJ, Deans JP. Alanine-170 and proline-172 are critical determinants for extracellular CD20 epitopes; heterogeneity in the fine specificity of CD20 monoclonal antibodies is defined by additional requirements imposed by both amino acid sequence and quaternary structure. Blood. 2002;99:3256–3562
  81. Polyak MJ, Tailor SH, Deans JP. Identification of a cytoplasmic region of CD20 required for its redistribution to a detergent-insoluble membrane compartment. J. Immunol. 1998;161:3242–3248
  82. Presta LG, Chen H, O'Connor SJ, Chisholm V, Meng YG, Krummen L, et al. Humanization of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody for the therapy of solid tumors and other disorders. Cancer Res. 1997;57:4593–4599
  83. Pulczynski S, Boesen AM, Jensen OM. Modulation and intracellular transport of CD20 and CD21 antigens induced by B1 and B2 monoclonal antibodies in RAJI and JOK-1 cells – an immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy study. Leuk. Res. 1994;18:541–552
  84. Ravetch JV, Lanier LL. Immune inhibitory receptors. Science. 2000;290:84–89
  85. Riechmann L, Clark M, Waldmann H, Winter G. Reshaping human antibodies for therapy. Nature. 1988;332:323–327
  86. Riethmacher D, Sonnenberg-Riethmacher E, Brinkmann V, Yamaai T, Lewin GR, Birchmeier C. Severe neuropathies in mice with targeted mutations in the ErbB3 receptor. Nature. 1997;389:725–730
  87. Romond EH, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:1673–1684
  88. Ross JS, et al. The Her-2/neu gene and protein in breast cancer 2003: biomarker and target of therapy. Oncologist. 2003;8:307–325
  89. Saaristo A, Karpanen T, Alitalo K. Mechanisms of angiogenesis and their use in the inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis. Oncogene. 2000;19:6122–6129
  90. Skvortsova I, Skvortsov S, Popper BA, Haidenberger A, Saurer M, Gunkel AR, et al. Rituximab enhances radiation-triggered apoptosis in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cells via caspase-dependent and -independent mechanisms. J. Radiat. Res. (Tokyo). 2006;47:183–196
  91. Slamon DJ, et al. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989;244:707–712
  92. Slamon DJ, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;344:783–792
  93. Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N, et al. Phase III randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and trastuzumab with docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab in HER2 positive early breast cancer patients: BCIRG 006 study. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2005;94(Suppl. 1):S5
  94. Spiridon CI, Ghetie MA, Uhr J, Marches R, Li JL, Shen GL, et al. Targeting multiple Her-2 epitopes with monoclonal antibodies results in improved antigrowth activity of a human breast cancer cell line in vitro and in vivo. Clin. Cancer. Res. 2002;8:1720–1730
  95. Spiridon CI, Guinn S, Vitetta ES. A comparison of the in vitro and in vivo activities of IgG and F(ab′)2 fragments of a mixture of three monoclonal anti-Her-2 antibodies. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:3542–3551
  96. Stancovski I, Hurwitz E, Leitner O, Ullrich A, Yarden Y, Sela M. Mechanistic aspects of the opposing effects of monoclonal antibodies to the ERBB2 receptor on tumor growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991;88:8691–8695
  97. Stein R, Belisle E, Hansen HJ, Goldenberg DM. Epitope specificity of the anti-(B cell lymphoma) monoclonal antibody, LL2. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 1993;37:293–298
  98. Sulis ML, Parsons R. PTEN: from pathology to biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2003;13:478–483
  99. Tuscano JM, O'Donnell RT, Miers LA, Kroger LA, Kukis DL, Lamborn KR, et al. Anti-CD22 ligand-blocking antibody HB22.7 has independent lymphomacidal properties and augments the efficacy of 90Y-DOTA-peptide-Lym-1 in lymphoma xenografts. Blood. 2003;101:3641–3647
  100. Valabrega G, et al. TGFalpha expression impairs Trastuzumab-induced HER2 downregulation. Oncogene. 2005;24:3002–3010
  101. van Meerten T, van Rijn RS, Hol S, Hagenbeek A, Ebeling SB. Complement-induced cell death by rituximab depends on CD20 expression level and acts complementary to antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:4027–4035
  102. Vose JM, Link BK, Grossbard ML, Czuczman M, Grillo-Lopez A, Fisher RI. Long-term update of a phase II study of rituximab in combination with CHOP chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2005;46:1569–1573
  103. Weng WK, Levy R. Two immunoglobulin G fragment C receptor polymorphisms independently predict response to rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003;21:3940–3947
  104. Yang XD, Jia XC, Corvalan JR, Wang P, Davis CG, Jakobovits A. Eradication of established tumors by a fully human monoclonal antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor without concomitant chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 1999;59:1236–1243
  105. Yarden Y. Agonistic antibodies stimulate the kinase encoded by the neu protooncogene in living cells but the oncogenic mutant is constitutively active. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1990;87:2569–2573

PII: S1574-7891(07)00009-9

doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2007.01.003

Molecular Oncology
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 42-54, June 2007