Prognostic factors versus predictive factors: Examples from a clinical trial of erlotinib☆
Abstract
It would be helpful to have factors that could identify patients who will, or will not, benefit from treatment with specific therapies. Ideally, these should be molecular-based factors. When results with molecular-based factors are disappointing, physicians often use clinical characteristics to make treatment decisions. Several characteristics have been suggested to predict sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in patients with non-small lung cancer, including gender, histology, smoking history. This report demonstrates that gender and histology are actually prognostic, rather than predictive factors. Before biomarkers or clinical characteristics are included in guidelines for selecting patients for specific treatments, it is imperative that the prognostic effects of these factors are distinguished from their ability to predict a differential clinical benefit from the specific treatment.
Keywords: Prognostic, Predictive, Epidermal growth factor receptor, Non-small lung cancer, Erlotinib, Smoking, Histology
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ Presented in part at the 13th Danish Cancer Society Symposium: From the Bench to the Bedside and Back, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 27–29, 2007.
PII: S1574-7891(07)00102-0
doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2007.12.001
© 2007 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

