Molecular Oncology
Volume 3, Issue 5 , Pages 394-401, December 2009

Review on early technology assessments of nanotechnologies in oncology

  • Valesca P. Retèl

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Marjan J.M. Hummel

      Affiliations

    • School of Governance and Management, University of Twente, MB-HTSR, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Wim H. van Harten

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • School of Governance and Management, University of Twente, MB-HTSR, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 5122860; fax: +31 20 6691449.

Received 2 February 2009; received in revised form 11 May 2009; accepted 11 May 2009. published online 08 June 2009.

Abstract 

Nanotechnology is expected to play an increasingly important role in the diagnostics, prognostics, and management of targeted cancer treatments. While papers have described promising results for nanotechnology in experimental settings, the translation of fundamental research into clinical applications has yet to be widely adopted. In future, policy makers will need to anticipate new developments for clinical implementation and introduce technology assessments. Here we present an overview of the literature on the technology assessments that have already been undertaken on early stage nanotechnology in cancer care, with particular emphasis placed on clinical efficacy, efficiency, logistics, patient-related features and technology dynamics.

Owing to the current stage of development of most nanotechnologies, we found only a limited number of publications describing the application of either Health Technology Assessment (HTA) or Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA). In spite of the promising conclusions of most papers concerning the benefits of clinical implementation, actual clinically relevant applications were rarely encountered, and so far only a few publications report application of systematic forms of technology assessment. Most articles consider aspects of environmental safety, regulation and ethics, often mentioning the need to investigate such issues more thoroughly. Evaluation of financial and organizational aspects is often missing. In order to obtain a realistic perspective on the translation and implementation process there is a need for a broad and systematic evaluation of nanotechnologies at early stages of development. Assessment methods taking technology dynamics into account, such as Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA) should be considered for evaluation purposes.

Keywords: Review, Nanotechnology, Genomics, Oncology, Early technology assessment, Dynamics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1574-7891(09)00072-6

doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2009.05.001

Molecular Oncology
Volume 3, Issue 5 , Pages 394-401, December 2009