Molecular Oncology
Volume 4, Issue 3 , Pages 255-266, June 2010

Genomic instability in breast cancer: Pathogenesis and clinical implications

  • Kevin A. Kwei

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CCSR-3245A, 269 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5176, USA
  • ,
  • Yvonne Kung

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CCSR-3245A, 269 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5176, USA
  • ,
  • Keyan Salari

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CCSR-3245A, 269 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5176, USA
    • Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, CCSR-3245A, 269 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5176, USA
  • ,
  • Ilona N. Holcomb

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CCSR-3245A, 269 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5176, USA
  • ,
  • Jonathan R. Pollack

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CCSR-3245A, 269 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5176, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 650 736 1987.

Received 24 February 2010; received in revised form 27 March 2010; accepted 2 April 2010. published online 20 April 2010.

Abstract 

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, appreciable by molecular markers, gene-expression profiles, and most recently, patterns of genomic alteration. In particular, genomic profiling has revealed three distinct patterns of DNA copy-number alteration: a “simple” type with few gains or losses of whole chromosome arms, an “amplifier” type with focal high-level DNA amplifications, and a “complex” type marked by numerous low-amplitude changes and copy-number transitions. The three patterns are associated with distinct gene-expression subtypes, and preferentially target different loci in the genome (implicating distinct cancer genes). Moreover, the different patterns of alteration imply distinct underlying mechanisms of genomic instability. The amplifier pattern may arise from transient telomere dysfunction, although new data suggest ongoing “amplifier” instability. The complex pattern shows similarity to breast cancers with germline BRCA1 mutation, which also exhibit “basal-like” expression profiles and complex-pattern genomes, implicating a possible defect in BRCA1-associated repair of DNA double-strand breaks. As such, targeting presumptive DNA repair defects represents a promising area of clinical investigation. Future studies should clarify the pathogenesis of breast cancers with amplifier and complex-pattern genomes, and will likely identify new therapeutic opportunities.

Keywords: Breast cancer, Genomic instability, DNA amplification, DNA repair defect, Basal-like, BRCA1

Abbreviations: BER, base excision repair, BFB, breakage-fusion-bridge, CGH, comparative genomic hybridization, CIN, chromosome instability, CNA, copy-number alteration, DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ, DM, double minute, DSB, double-strand break, ER, estrogen receptor, FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization, HR, homologous recombination, HSR, homogeneously staining region, LOH, loss of heterozygosity, MSI, microsatellite instability, NER, nucleotide excision repair, NHEJ, non-homologous end joining, PR, progesterone receptor, ROS, reactive oxygen species, SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1574-7891(10)00023-2

doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2010.04.001

Molecular Oncology
Volume 4, Issue 3 , Pages 255-266, June 2010